Thursday, 30 June, 2022

Uber and Lyft sued by California, accused of denying driver benefits

Image copyright
Getty Pictures

Image caption

California Lawyer General Xavier Becerra

The condition of California has sued trip-hailing firms Uber and Lyft, accusing them of denying their motorists compensated ill leave and other rewards.

In the lawsuit, Legal professional Standard Xavier Becerra stated the firms are wrongly classifying their drivers as impartial contractors, as an alternative of employees.

The go follows the landmark legislation the condition passed last 12 months to make clear rules for so-referred to as gig-workers.

Uber mentioned it would contest the statements.

The transportation large and lesser rival Lyft experienced unsuccessfully opposed California’s legislation when it was under dialogue past yr, indicating it would lessen versatility valued by motorists.

The firms are now striving to gain guidance amongst condition voters for ballot proposal that would exempt them from the legislation. Uber has also challenged the regulation in courtroom.

“At a time when California’s financial state is in crisis with four million individuals out of do the job, we want to make it easier, not more difficult for people to swiftly get started earning,” Uber mentioned in response to the lawsuit.

“We will contest this motion in court whilst at the identical time pushing to raise the regular of independent work for motorists in California, including with assured least earnings and new gains.”

Unemployment statements

Lyft reported: “We are on the lookout ahead to functioning with the Legal professional Typical and mayors all across the state to provide all the gains of California’s innovation economic climate to as numerous workers as probable”.

Mr Becerra was joined by metropolis lawyers in San Francisco, San Diego and Los Angeles in submitting the fit.

They are in search of $2,500 per violation – a sum likely to reach into the thousands and thousands – from the companies, which they say have saved “hundreds of tens of millions of bucks” which they would if not have experienced to pay into governing administration programmes, such as unemployment coverage. Those people programmes are now straining beneath a spike in claims due to the pandemic.

“Uber and Lyft are transportation corporations in the business of providing rides to shoppers, and their motorists are the employees who supply the rides they offer,” the lawsuit says. “The fact that Uber and Lyft communicate with their drivers by employing an app does not all of a sudden strip drivers of their essential legal rights as employees.”

Uber and Lyft have also pushed Congress to contain their drivers in the federal government’s coronavirus reduction, including expanded unemployment benefits. Generally, this kind of added benefits are reserved for employers who spend into the programmes.

Supply hyperlink